Service Case - the appellants were working on the post of Stenographers when the subject illegal payment was made to them - It is not reflected in the record that such payment was made to the appellants on account of any fraud or misrepresentation by them - when the financial benefit was extended to the appellants by the District Judge, Cuttack, the same was subsequently not approved by the High Court which resulted in the subsequent order of recovery - It is also not in dispute that the payment was made in the year 2017 whereas the recovery was directed in the year 2023 - in the meanwhile, the appellants have retired in the year 2020 - It is also an admitted position that the appellants were not afforded any opportunity of hearing before issuing the order of recovery - The appellants having superannuated on a ministerial post of Stenographer were admittedly not holding any gazetted post as such applying the principle enunciated by this Court in the above quoted judgment, the recovery is found unsustainable
Case Law »
|
Service Matters - Notional increment - Directing that Clauses (a), (b) and (c) of the order dated 06.09.2024 will be treated as final directions - Clause (d) of the order dated 06.09.2024 requires modification - (a) The judgment dated 11.04.2023 will be given effect to in case of third parties from the date of the judgment, that is, the pension by taking into account one increment will be payable on and after 01.05.2023 - Enhanced pension for the period prior to 31.04.2023 will not be paid - (b) For persons who have filed writ petitions and succeeded, the directions given in the said judgment will operate as res judicata, and accordingly, an enhanced pension by taking one increment would have to be paid - (c) The direction in (b) will not apply, where the judgment has not attained finality, and cases where an appeal has been preferred, or if filed, is entertained by the appellate court - (d) In case any retired employee filed an application for intervention/impleadment/writ petition/original application before the Central Administrative Tribunal/High Courts/this Court, the enhanced pension by including one increment will be payable for the period of three years prior to the month in which the application for intervention/ impleadment/ writ petition/ original application was filed.
Case Law »
|